<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Designing the ultimate wayfinding typeface</title>
	<atom:link href="http://opentype.info/blog/2009/09/02/designing-the-ultimate-wayfinding-typeface/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://opentype.info/blog/2009/09/02/designing-the-ultimate-wayfinding-typeface/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 08:17:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralf Herrmann</title>
		<link>http://opentype.info/blog/2009/09/02/designing-the-ultimate-wayfinding-typeface/comment-page-1/#comment-2053</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralf Herrmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 11:34:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opentype.info/blog/?p=183#comment-2053</guid>
		<description>That image should just demonstrate the effect in general and therefore I chose 3 type styles with 3 different stroke widths.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That image should just demonstrate the effect in general and therefore I chose 3 type styles with 3 different stroke widths.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom dG</title>
		<link>http://opentype.info/blog/2009/09/02/designing-the-ultimate-wayfinding-typeface/comment-page-1/#comment-2052</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom dG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 10:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opentype.info/blog/?p=183#comment-2052</guid>
		<description>This looks like a good typeface, and the development is certainly interesting. 

However, the halation example with &#039;Transport Bold&#039; is not really fair. As you are no doubt aware, the typeface face comes in two weights, actually called Transport Heavy and Transport Medium. Heavy is for use in black on a light background, whilst Medium is for use reversed out, to compensate for the effect of halation. In the example above, it would have been fairer to compare your typeface with Transport Medium.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This looks like a good typeface, and the development is certainly interesting. </p>
<p>However, the halation example with &#8216;Transport Bold&#8217; is not really fair. As you are no doubt aware, the typeface face comes in two weights, actually called Transport Heavy and Transport Medium. Heavy is for use in black on a light background, whilst Medium is for use reversed out, to compensate for the effect of halation. In the example above, it would have been fairer to compare your typeface with Transport Medium.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart Crawford</title>
		<link>http://opentype.info/blog/2009/09/02/designing-the-ultimate-wayfinding-typeface/comment-page-1/#comment-2022</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Crawford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 17:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opentype.info/blog/?p=183#comment-2022</guid>
		<description>Really enjoyed seeing the process behind the font. I was just about to buy one or two weights when I came across this. Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really enjoyed seeing the process behind the font. I was just about to buy one or two weights when I came across this. Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralf Herrmann</title>
		<link>http://opentype.info/blog/2009/09/02/designing-the-ultimate-wayfinding-typeface/comment-page-1/#comment-1989</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralf Herrmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 10:17:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opentype.info/blog/?p=183#comment-1989</guid>
		<description>Yes, there will be an additional set of pictograms:
http://opentype.info/blog/2011/04/13/wayfinding-symbols-with-opentype-magic/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, there will be an additional set of pictograms:<br />
<a href="http://opentype.info/blog/2011/04/13/wayfinding-symbols-with-opentype-magic/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://opentype.info/blog/2011/04/13/wayfinding-symbols-with-opentype-magic/'>http://opentype.info/blog/2011/04/13/wayfinding-symbols-with-opentype-magic/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren</title>
		<link>http://opentype.info/blog/2009/09/02/designing-the-ultimate-wayfinding-typeface/comment-page-1/#comment-1988</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 10:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opentype.info/blog/?p=183#comment-1988</guid>
		<description>Hi Ralf

Smashing project. I wondered, do you have plans to include a set of pictograms to accompany the typeface?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ralf</p>
<p>Smashing project. I wondered, do you have plans to include a set of pictograms to accompany the typeface?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralf Herrmann</title>
		<link>http://opentype.info/blog/2009/09/02/designing-the-ultimate-wayfinding-typeface/comment-page-1/#comment-1971</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralf Herrmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 16:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opentype.info/blog/?p=183#comment-1971</guid>
		<description>Clearview HWY and Wayfinding Sans are or will be both good choices for many signage projects. I don&#039;t necessarily need to find out if one should perform slightly better in certain situations. Especially since the choice of typeface is just one of many many variables that make a good wayfinding system. 

An obvious difference is the rather extreme x-height of Clearview HWY, which works fine for the US signs it was made. In contrast, Wayfinding Sans has very prominent diacritical marks which are important for signage in many countries outside of the US.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clearview HWY and Wayfinding Sans are or will be both good choices for many signage projects. I don&#8217;t necessarily need to find out if one should perform slightly better in certain situations. Especially since the choice of typeface is just one of many many variables that make a good wayfinding system. </p>
<p>An obvious difference is the rather extreme x-height of Clearview HWY, which works fine for the US signs it was made. In contrast, Wayfinding Sans has very prominent diacritical marks which are important for signage in many countries outside of the US.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl</title>
		<link>http://opentype.info/blog/2009/09/02/designing-the-ultimate-wayfinding-typeface/comment-page-1/#comment-1966</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 20:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opentype.info/blog/?p=183#comment-1966</guid>
		<description>Your work is important and impressive. I would like to see comparison data or font with Terminal Design&#039;s &quot;Clearview Hwy&quot; font adopted for use on road signs in the USA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your work is important and impressive. I would like to see comparison data or font with Terminal Design&#8217;s &#8220;Clearview Hwy&#8221; font adopted for use on road signs in the USA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://opentype.info/blog/2009/09/02/designing-the-ultimate-wayfinding-typeface/comment-page-1/#comment-1901</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 13:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opentype.info/blog/?p=183#comment-1901</guid>
		<description>Ralf -- Could you summarize in a sentence or two what the differences would be (as I&#039;d like to understand)?

My considerations: 
Large font at a distance. 
People with varying eyesight.
Maximizing readability. 
A font without &quot;distractions&quot; or flair to take away from the content.

I don&#039;t put too many words on a slide, but when I do, I like them to be readable. :)

I&#039;m doing a presentation today for more than 200 people and had been hunting around for something &quot;different.&quot; (Although, it&#039;s much too late for me to be switching fonts, etc. now anyway -- but I&#039;d read through your excellent post with great interest).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ralf &#8212; Could you summarize in a sentence or two what the differences would be (as I&#8217;d like to understand)?</p>
<p>My considerations:<br />
Large font at a distance.<br />
People with varying eyesight.<br />
Maximizing readability.<br />
A font without &#8220;distractions&#8221; or flair to take away from the content.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t put too many words on a slide, but when I do, I like them to be readable. <img src='http://opentype.info/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I&#8217;m doing a presentation today for more than 200 people and had been hunting around for something &#8220;different.&#8221; (Although, it&#8217;s much too late for me to be switching fonts, etc. now anyway &#8212; but I&#8217;d read through your excellent post with great interest).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralf Herrmann</title>
		<link>http://opentype.info/blog/2009/09/02/designing-the-ultimate-wayfinding-typeface/comment-page-1/#comment-1900</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralf Herrmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 13:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opentype.info/blog/?p=183#comment-1900</guid>
		<description>Sure, it’s work in progress.
It’s not a screen font though. There are some similarities in terms of legibility, but making a screen font out of it, would be an entirely different project.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure, it’s work in progress.<br />
It’s not a screen font though. There are some similarities in terms of legibility, but making a screen font out of it, would be an entirely different project.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://opentype.info/blog/2009/09/02/designing-the-ultimate-wayfinding-typeface/comment-page-1/#comment-1899</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 13:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opentype.info/blog/?p=183#comment-1899</guid>
		<description>Ralf -- are you still planning on making this available? I see that this was posted nearly 2 1/2 years ago -- I was interested in trying the font in some presentations to see if it helped with legibility for those who don&#039;t sit as close to the screen. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ralf &#8212; are you still planning on making this available? I see that this was posted nearly 2 1/2 years ago &#8212; I was interested in trying the font in some presentations to see if it helped with legibility for those who don&#8217;t sit as close to the screen. <img src='http://opentype.info/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martijn de Heer</title>
		<link>http://opentype.info/blog/2009/09/02/designing-the-ultimate-wayfinding-typeface/comment-page-1/#comment-1894</link>
		<dc:creator>Martijn de Heer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 19:31:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opentype.info/blog/?p=183#comment-1894</guid>
		<description>Amazing! Very nice how you designed it and those little changes but that make a big difference in legibility! Beautiful!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazing! Very nice how you designed it and those little changes but that make a big difference in legibility! Beautiful!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fitoschido</title>
		<link>http://opentype.info/blog/2009/09/02/designing-the-ultimate-wayfinding-typeface/comment-page-1/#comment-1808</link>
		<dc:creator>Fitoschido</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 11:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opentype.info/blog/?p=183#comment-1808</guid>
		<description>This typeface would perform excellent for signage in Mexico, where we suffer a mixture of Interstate and Arial (the latter being more common as the time passes).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This typeface would perform excellent for signage in Mexico, where we suffer a mixture of Interstate and Arial (the latter being more common as the time passes).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eMPee584</title>
		<link>http://opentype.info/blog/2009/09/02/designing-the-ultimate-wayfinding-typeface/comment-page-1/#comment-1805</link>
		<dc:creator>eMPee584</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 09:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opentype.info/blog/?p=183#comment-1805</guid>
		<description>To put it simple: you actually created the most readable font style i ever witnissed. Now try and get it standardized as an European Norm! Send the International Road Federation (irfnet.org - &quot;Better roads, better world&quot;) a nice set of high-quality example printouts! Don&#039;t stop at this excellent blog post! You can do it Ralf :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To put it simple: you actually created the most readable font style i ever witnissed. Now try and get it standardized as an European Norm! Send the International Road Federation (irfnet.org &#8211; &#8220;Better roads, better world&#8221;) a nice set of high-quality example printouts! Don&#8217;t stop at this excellent blog post! You can do it Ralf <img src='http://opentype.info/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edina</title>
		<link>http://opentype.info/blog/2009/09/02/designing-the-ultimate-wayfinding-typeface/comment-page-1/#comment-1694</link>
		<dc:creator>Edina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 17:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opentype.info/blog/?p=183#comment-1694</guid>
		<description>A very informative article. This helps me a lot for my campus project. Thank you so much!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A very informative article. This helps me a lot for my campus project. Thank you so much!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: René</title>
		<link>http://opentype.info/blog/2009/09/02/designing-the-ultimate-wayfinding-typeface/comment-page-1/#comment-1578</link>
		<dc:creator>René</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jul 2011 11:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opentype.info/blog/?p=183#comment-1578</guid>
		<description>The European TERN-font is really a joke. Althought I think Wayfinding is surely better legible than Tiresias Signfont or Transport, I still like DIN and Highway Gothic (in my country: RWS-Ee, RWS-Dd and RWS-Cc) most.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The European TERN-font is really a joke. Althought I think Wayfinding is surely better legible than Tiresias Signfont or Transport, I still like DIN and Highway Gothic (in my country: RWS-Ee, RWS-Dd and RWS-Cc) most.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

